Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

Beyerdynamic
84 Overall Score
vs
JBL Tune 670NC

JBL Tune 670NC

JBL
90 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

No customer feedback yet

JBL Tune 670NC

87 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

Most users love these JBL headphones, praising excellent sound quality, effective noise cancellation, comfortable fit, and long battery life—many report great value for the price. One reviewer had a defective unit with no sound in one ear. A few users appreciate the easy controls, foldable design, and app connectivity. Overall, sentiment is strongly positive with a minor quality control concern.

Pros
  • Excellent sound quality
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Long battery life
  • Comfortable fit
  • Great value for price
Cons
  • Potential defective unit (no sound in one ear)
  • No answers to Q&A questions
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Noise cancellation 4
👍 Battery life 3
👍 Comfort 2
👍 Value for money 3
👎 Build quality 1

Scores

Budget
Beyerdynamic
87
JBL
93
Gaming
Beyerdynamic
88
JBL
80
Music
Beyerdynamic
88
JBL
74
Commute
Beyerdynamic
75
JBL
83
Studio
Beyerdynamic
82
JBL
67
Work
Beyerdynamic
79
JBL
79
Calls
Beyerdynamic
68
JBL
65

Specifications

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300JBL Tune 670NC
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable✓✓
Weight0.32 kg0.17 kg★
Ear Cushionmemory foamsoft ear cushions
Headbandmemory foampadded headband
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size45 mm★32 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min5 Hz★20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz★20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—98 dB★
Max SPL—95 dB★
Hi-Res Audio✓★✗
CodecsaptX Lossless, aptX AdaptiveSBC, AAC, LC3
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Typeadaptiveadaptive
Transparency✓✓
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.4★5.3
ProfilesAVDTP, AVDTP, GAVDP, SPP, A2DP, AVRCP, HFPA2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8
Multipoint✓✓
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable✓✓
Cable Length—1.2192000150680542 m
Range15 m★—
Battery
Battery Life50 hrs70 hrs★
Charge Time2 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging10 Minutes for 5 Hours5min=3hrs
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Capacity—690 mAh★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★1
NC Mic✗✓★
Boom Mic✗✗
Detachable Mic✗—
Features
Voice AssistantDolby Head Tracking Technologyvoice assistant
Touch Controls✗✗
AppBeyerdynamicJBL Headphones
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗✓★

Pros & Cons

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (87th percentile)87th %ile

JBL Tune 670NC

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile

Pricing

JBL Tune 670NC is CA$220 cheaper (2.8x less).

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 3000.247score per dollar
vs
JBL Tune 670NC0.747score per dollar

JBL Tune 670NC offers 3.0x better value for money

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300

JBL Tune 670NC

Verdict

★ Winner: JBL Tune 670NC

Scores 90 overall, wins 2 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 43 specs.

Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 Better at:

CallsMusicGamingStudio

JBL Tune 670NC Better at:

BudgetCommute

Also Consider