Behringer HPM1000
Behringer
23 Overall Score
vs
TOZO HT2
TOZO
82 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Music
Commute
Studio
Work
Calls
Specifications
| Behringer HPM1000 | TOZO HT2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.39 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | Leather |
| Headband | — | Leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 45 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Behringer HPM1000 Closed-Back Multi-Purpose Stereo Headphones, 5-Pack | TOZO Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Headphones, Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headset, 60H Playtime, Hi-Res Audio Custom EQ via App Deep Bass Comfort Fit Ear Cups, for Home Office Travel |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Cable Length | 2 m | 1.8300000429153442 m |
| Range | — | 30 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | higher voltages and charging interfaces |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| App | — | TOZO APP |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
Pros & Cons
Behringer HPM1000
- Strong sound (77th percentile)
- Below average comfort (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
TOZO HT2
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
Behringer HPM1000
TOZO HT2
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: TOZO HT2
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 34 specs.
