fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1
26 Overall Score
vs
AMD 100-000000136

AMD 100-000000136

AMD
40 Overall Score

Scores

Ai Llm
fosa1
23
AMD
46
Server
fosa1
23
AMD
44
Productivity
fosa1
26
AMD
42
Budget
fosa1
28
AMD
21
Gaming
fosa1
25
AMD
23
Efficiency
fosa1
23
AMD
15

Specifications

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izudAMD 100-000000136
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
Series—EPYC
ModelX56507532
Codename—Rome
Classdesktopserver
Cores & Clocks
Cores632★
Threads12★—
Base Clock
2,660
2,400
Boost Clock
3,060
3,300
Cache
L3 Cache
12
256
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3DDR4★
Max Speed
1,333
3,200
Channels38★
Max Memory
288
No data
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1366EPYC ROME
PCIe—4.0
PCIe LanesNo data
128
TDP95★200

Pros & Cons

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

  • Strong platform (65th percentile)
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
  • Below average ai (26th percentile)

AMD 100-000000136

  • Strong platform (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (77th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (33rd percentile)

Pricing

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud is CA$489 cheaper (29.8x less).

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud1.533score per dollar
vs
AMD 100-0000001360.079score per dollar

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud offers 19.4x better value for money

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

AMD 100-000000136

Verdict

★ Winner: AMD 100-000000136

Scores 40 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud Better at:

BudgetGamingEfficiency

AMD 100-000000136 Better at:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

Also Consider