Anker T8170
Anker
30 Overall Score
vs
OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver
OM System
58 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Anker T8170
No customer feedback yet
OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver
72 out of 100 medium confidence 19 reviews
The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight design, and excellent image quality, making it a favorite for travel and beginners. However, several verified reviews report serious reliability issues, including the camera bricking after months of use, and poor customer service from Olympus. Connectivity limitations, such as no webcam mode and a clunky app, are also common complaints, though many users find the camera's value and ease of use outweigh these drawbacks.
Pros
- Compact and lightweight design
- Excellent image quality
- Great for beginners
- Good value for money
- Stylish retro look
Cons
- Poor customer service
- Reliability issues after months
- Limited connectivity (no webcam)
- Clunky app and WiFi
- No USB-C charging
Build quality 5
Image quality 10
Portability 8
Ease of use 7
Customer service 3
Reliability 2
Scores
Streaming
Youtube
Vlogging
Beginner
Video
Product Photography
Photography
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Specifications
| Anker T8170 | OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 3 MP | 20.299999237060547 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Processor | — | TruePic VIII |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Contrast Detection: 121 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✗ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 8.699999809265137 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 15 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✗ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264/MOV |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.63 kg | 0.34 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 360 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | — | Micro-USB 2.0★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Anker T8170
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average sensor (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (33rd percentile)
OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver
- Strong battery (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong evf (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong display (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average social proof (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
Pricing
Anker T81700.175score per dollar
vs
OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Silver0.065score per dollar
Anker T8170 offers 2.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark IV
Scores 58 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 22 of 33 specs.
