Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm
Canon
64 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Yongnuo
81 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm | Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 12 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 55 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 12 | 14 |
| Groups | 10 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.21 kg★ | 0.32 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | STM stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:4★ | 0.5x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Preise
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm0.188Score pro Dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.159Score pro Dollar
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 55mm bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
