Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Zeiss Milvus 50mm f/2M ZF.2 50mm
Zeiss
45 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Macro
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Zeiss Milvus 50mm f/2M ZF.2 50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 8 |
| Groups | — | 6 |
| Coating | — | ZEISS T* Anti-Reflective Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 10★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon F |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.66 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 240 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Zeiss Milvus 50mm f/2M ZF.2 50mm
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong macro (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (32nd percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Preise
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Zeiss Milvus 50mm f/2M ZF.2 50mm
Fazit
Gewinner: Zeiss Milvus 50mm f/2M ZF.2 50mm
Scores 45 overall, wins 1 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.
