Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon L EF 24-105mm Is USM Image Stabilizer Autofocus USA
Canon
36 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon L EF 24-105mm Is USM Image Stabilizer Autofocus USA | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 105 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon L EF 24-105mm Is USM Image Stabilizer Autofocus USA
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 6 specs.