Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm
Zeiss
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spezifikationen
| Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 17 |
| Groups | 8 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | L-Mount |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.12 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 800 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:4★ | 0.5x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Preise
Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm0.010Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.056Score pro Dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm bietet 5.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
