Biotar 75mm f/1.5 II 75mm

Biotar 75mm f/1.5 II 75mm

36 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Biotar 75mm
26
Canon
97
Portrait
Biotar 75mm
56
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Biotar 75mm
32
Canon
90
Street
Biotar 75mm
37
Canon
82
Travel
Biotar 75mm
13
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Biotar 75mm
27
Canon
77
Landscape
Biotar 75mm
8
Canon
76
Professional
Biotar 75mm
29
Canon
75
Macro
Biotar 75mm
23
Canon
68

Spezifikationen

Biotar 75mm f/1.5 II 75mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min75 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max75 mm135 mm
Elements616
Groups412
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.5f/3.5
Min Aperturef/163.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades157
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
FormatFull-FrameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.52 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance750 mm390 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

Biotar 75mm f/1.5 II 75mm

  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Preise

Biotar 75mm f/1.5 II 75mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen