Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro
Laowa
35 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | — | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/10 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/0.15 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.39 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 20 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 50:1★ | 1:5.26 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Preise
Laowa Aurogon FF 10-50x Supermicro0.017Score pro Dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062Score pro Dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 bietet 3.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
