Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di II AFB028N700 18-400mm

Tamron Di II AFB028N700 18-400mm

Tamron
81 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Nikon
86
Tamron
78
Portrait
Nikon
79
Tamron
67
Travel
Nikon
71
Tamron
75
Street
Nikon
75
Tamron
57
Macro
Nikon
73
Tamron
69
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Tamron
57
Landscape
Nikon
68
Tamron
59
Professional
Nikon
66
Tamron
58
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
65
Tamron
62

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmTamron Di II AFB028N700 18-400mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm400 mm
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.48 kg0.70 kg
Filter Thread67 mm79 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SHLD
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm79 mm
Max Magnification1:2.9

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Tamron Di II AFB028N700 18-400mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di II AFB028N700 18-400mm Besser bei:

Travel