Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di II B028 18-400mm

Tamron Di II B028 18-400mm

Tamron
77 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Viltrox
74
Tamron
53
Budget
Viltrox
68
Tamron
71
Travel
Viltrox
59
Tamron
70
Portrait
Viltrox
69
Tamron
66
Macro
Viltrox
65
Tamron
68
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
68
Tamron
63
Video Cinema
Viltrox
66
Tamron
57
Professional
Viltrox
59
Tamron
57
Landscape
Viltrox
50
Tamron
54

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmTamron Di II B028 18-400mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm400 mm
Elements11
Groups9
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
Coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperture16f/3.5
Min Aperture1.73.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.17 kg0.70 kg
Filter Thread52 mm79 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMHLD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm79 mm
Max Magnification1:7.71:2.9

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di II B028 18-400mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile

Preise

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Tamron Di II B028 18-400mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 74 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Besser bei:

StreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di II B028 18-400mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscape

Auch in Betracht ziehen