TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MOSWAG

MOSWAG

MOSWAG
46 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
79
MOSWAG
57
Gaming
TOZO
79
MOSWAG
46
Travel
TOZO
78
MOSWAG
32
Fitness
TOZO
72
MOSWAG
33
Calls
TOZO
70
MOSWAG
30
Commute
TOZO
70
MOSWAG
30
Music
TOZO
68
MOSWAG
44

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsMOSWAG
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.02 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm14.199999809265137 mm
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB118 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACMOSWAG Wired Earbuds, 3.5mm Jack in-Ear Headphones with Microphone Volum Control Clear Calls Suitable for iPhone, iPad, Samsung, Computer, Laptop, School Students, Black
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

MOSWAG

  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong sound (79th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Preise

TOZO Crystal Pods

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen