Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Green 2025
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite Coral Red 2025
买家怎么说
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Green 2025
小米平板因其出色的性价比、流畅的性能和鲜艳的显示屏而广受好评。用户强调快速的144Hz刷新率、良好的电池续航和高级的做工。一些人指出自动刷新率可能会使平板变慢,并且像荣耀Magic Pad 2这样的竞争对手在价格上提供更多,但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 流畅的144Hz显示屏
- 良好的电池续航
- 高级做工
- 附带45W充电器的快速充电
缺点
- 自动刷新率可能使平板变慢
- 竞争对手提供更多价值
- 没有最新的骁龙CPU
- 没有合适的适配器充电慢
- 小米不提供操作系统更新
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite Coral Red 2025
三星 Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 因其快速的性能、明亮的显示屏和长电池续航获得了压倒性的正面反馈。用户欣赏其轻巧的设计以及与其他三星设备的无缝集成,尽管有些人指出它较重且未附带充电器。总体而言,它强烈推荐用于日常使用,并提供了极佳的性价比。
优点
- 快速性能
- 明亮清晰的显示屏
- 长电池续航
- 轻巧设计
- 与三星生态系统无缝集成
缺点
- 未附带充电器
- 对某些用户来说较重
- 游戏偶尔出现故障
评分
规格
| Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2800 MHz | Exynos 1380★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | 无数据 | |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | SSD | SSD |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11.2" | 10.9" |
| Resolution | 3200 px★ | 2112 px |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 800 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | Wi-Fi |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stylus Model | — | S-Pen |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✗ | ✗ |
| Face Unlock | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 0.52 kg |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
优缺点
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Green 2025
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong gpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite 10.9" Lite Coral Red 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong storage (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong battery (77th percentile)
- Below average cpu (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average gpu (8th percentile)8th %ile
结论
Scores 77 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.