ADATA LEGEND 700 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
ADATA
50 综合评分
vs
SanDisk Optimus GX 7100 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
71 综合评分
买家怎么说
ADATA LEGEND 700 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
SanDisk Optimus GX 7100 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
88 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
用户对这款Sandisk固态硬盘非常满意，称赞其速度、可靠性和紧凑尺寸。一位用户将其用作重要文件的备份，另一位用户用它替换了故障的NVMe。唯一的轻微不满是Geek Squad的安装过程漫长，但产品本身运行良好。
优点
- 性能快速
- 可靠的备份
- 紧凑尺寸
- 在高温机箱中运行良好
- 易于安装
缺点
- Geek Squad安装过程漫长
- 短电缆的脆弱性
- 未报告问题
Performance 3
Reliability 3
Installation process 1
Size 1
Heat resistance 1
评分
Budget
Laptop
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Portable
规格
| ADATA LEGEND 700 | SanDisk Optimus GX 7100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 4★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
ADATA LEGEND 700 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong random (79th percentile)
- Strong affordability (74th percentile)
- Strong endurance (69th percentile)
- Below average social proof (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
SanDisk Optimus GX 7100 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong endurance (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong speed (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)
- Below average capacity (26th percentile)
价格
ADATA LEGEND 700 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
No current pricing available
SanDisk Optimus GX 7100 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
结论
胜出: SanDisk Optimus GX 7100
Scores 71 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.
