Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Zeiss
72 综合评分
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Fujifilm
74 综合评分
评分
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Budget
Travel
Street
Macro
规格
| Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 140 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 23 |
| Groups | 11 | 16 |
| ED Elements | — | 6★ |
| Coating | ZEISS T* coating | Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.61 kg★ | 0.99 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Triple Linear Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 1.00 m★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.12x★ |
优缺点
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (28th percentile)
价格
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm0.005每美元得分
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm0.004每美元得分
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm 性价比高 1.3 倍
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
结论
胜出: Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Scores 74 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
