Samsung UN32H5000FFXZA

Samsung UN32H5000FFXZA

Samsung
10 综合评分
vs
GEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro Titanium Gray

GEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro Titanium Gray

GEEKOM
56 综合评分

评分

Entertainment
Samsung
10
GEEKOM
62
Developer
Samsung
9
GEEKOM
57
Compact
Samsung
8
GEEKOM
56
Student
Samsung
12
GEEKOM
54
Business
Samsung
12
GEEKOM
53
Creator
Samsung
4
GEEKOM
32
Ai Llm
Samsung
4
GEEKOM
30
Gaming
Samsung
3
GEEKOM
20

规格

Samsung UN32H5000FFXZAGEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro
Processor
CPUIntel Core Ultra 5 125H
CPU Multi-Core Score无数据
20,192
Cores1
Frequency1.2 GHz
L3 Cache18 MB
Graphics
GPUIntel Arc Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score无数据
5,484
Typeintegrated
VRAM8 GB
VRAM TypeShared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB
RAM GenerationLPDDR5X
Storage 11 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSD
Display
Size16"
Resolution2560 px
PanelIPS
Refresh Rate60 Hz120 Hz
Brightness400 nits
Color Gamut100% sRGB
Connectivity
USB Ports2
HDMI2 x HDMI
Wi-FiWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 6
Physical
Weight3.86 kg1.27 kg
Battery77 Wh
OSWindows 11 Pro

优缺点

Samsung UN32H5000FFXZA

  • Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong reliability (79th percentile)
  • Below average storage (2th percentile)2th %ile
  • Below average compact (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average gpu (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average port (15th percentile)15th %ile

GEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro Titanium Gray

  • Strong ram (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong screen (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong storage (70th percentile)
  • Strong cpu (69th percentile)
  • Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average port (30th percentile)

价格

Samsung UN32H5000FFXZA is R$9,314 cheaper (7.4x less).

Samsung UN32H5000FFXZA0.007每美元得分
vs
GEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro Titanium Gray0.005每美元得分

Samsung UN32H5000FFXZA 性价比高 1.4 倍

Samsung UN32H5000FFXZA

GEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro Titanium Gray

结论

胜出: GEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro

Scores 56 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 21 of 26 specs.

GEEKOM GeekBook 16" X16 Pro 更擅长:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorStudentBusinessDeveloperEntertainment

也值得考虑