ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7
ASUS
97 综合评分
vs
HP Tesla T4 16GB datacenter
HP
35 综合评分
选择ASUS GeForce RTX，如果...
Pick the ASUS ProArt RTX 5080 if you want a serious 4K gaming and content creation card, owners consistently report excellent thermals and impressive overclocking headroom, just make sure your case has room for it.
选择HP Tesla T4，如果...
Pick the HP Tesla R0W29A if you need a silent, low-power card for a server, compact workstation, or passive-cooling build where 70W TDP and 0.39 kg matter more than raw performance.
主要区别
- PassMark G3D: 35,666 on the ASUS vs 10,117 on the HP, that's a 3.5x gap in raw graphics performance
- Power draw is night and day: 70W passive cooling on the HP vs 360W with triple fans on the ASUS, one sips power silently while the other needs real airflow
- Gaming scores tell the story: 99/100 at 4K for the ASUS vs 14/100 for the HP, the Tesla isn't a gaming card at all
- Weight and size: 0.39 kg for the HP vs 1.41 kg for the ASUS, the ProArt is a chunky card that needs a spacious case
- Customer sentiment on the ASUS is solid at 4.7/5 from 206 reviews, with owners praising 4K performance and cool temps around 67-68°C under load, though the high price and one DOA unit are the main gripes
买家怎么说
ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7
78 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5080 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏中，许多用户指出它可以轻松处理要求苛刻的游戏。超频潜力令人印象深刻，一位用户在保持67-68°C低温的同时实现了3.3 GHz的升频。然而，高昂的价格是一个反复出现的问题，并且有一块卡到货时无法使用，需要更换。总体而言，推荐给有预算的人，特别是从RTX 3090或更早的旧世代升级的用户。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 令人印象深刻的超频潜力
- 负载下低温运行（67-68°C）
- 与高端型号相比性价比高
- 坚固的制造质量
缺点
- 价格高昂
- 有一块到货时无法使用
- 尺寸大需要宽敞的机箱
- 对于1080p游戏不划算
4k gaming performance 5
Overclocking potential 2
Thermal performance 2
Price value 4
Build quality 2
Reliability defects 1
HP Tesla T4 16GB datacenter
暂无用户反馈
评分
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Gaming 4k
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Budget
Workstation
Ai Llm
规格
| ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt | HP Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | GeForce RTX 5080 | Tesla T4 |
| Brand | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Turing |
| Class | consumer | datacenter |
| Process | 5★ | — |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7★ | — |
| Memory Bus | 无数据 | |
| Bandwidth | 无数据 | |
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | 无数据 | |
| Tensor Cores | 无数据 | |
| RT Cores | 84★ | — |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 56.279998779296875★ | — |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 56.279998779296875★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 360 | 70★ |
| Recommended PSU | 850★ | — |
| Power Connectors | 1x 16-Pin PCI Connector | — |
| Cooler | Triple Fan★ | Passive |
| Fans | 3★ | 1 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 x16 | PCIe |
| DisplayPort | 2★ | — |
| HDMI | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Max Displays | 4★ | — |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | 3840x2160 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 304★ | — |
| Slot Width | 2.5★ | — |
| Form Factor | Full Height | Low Profile |
| Weight | 1.41 kg | 0.39 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upscaling | DLSS 4 | — |
| AV1 Encode | ✓★ | — |
| VR Ready | ✓★ | — |
| DirectX | 12 | — |
| RGB | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong rt (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average affordability (18th percentile)18th %ile
HP Tesla T4 16GB datacenter
- Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ai (65th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average thermal (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average rt (24th percentile)
- Below average raster (27th percentile)
结论
胜出: ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt
Scores 97 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 25 of 39 specs.