DCMEKA A09B-HG01
DCMEKA
32 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
DCMEKA A09B-HG01
78 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
这些预算型入耳式监听耳机提供了令人印象深刻的音质，可与Shure SE225等昂贵得多的型号相媲美，许多用户称赞其低音响应和整体清晰度。舒适度总体不错，但有些人觉得佩戴疼痛，耳钩设计笨拙。做工对于价格来说还算可以，但缺乏海绵耳塞和隔音效果差是常见的抱怨，尤其是对鼓手而言。总的来说，它们为休闲聆听和监听提供了卓越的性价比，但可能不适合所有人的需求。
优点
- 价格实惠，音质出色
- 强劲的低音响应
- 许多用户佩戴舒适
- 性价比高
- 清晰立体的声音
缺点
- 对鼓手来说隔音效果差
- 部分用户佩戴不舒适
- 不含海绵耳塞
- 线缆长度较短
- 没有线缆夹
Sound quality 8
Value for money 7
Comfort 6
Noise isolation 4
Build quality 4
Cable quality 3
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| DCMEKA A09B-HG01 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | large, medium, small | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | in Ear Monitor Headphones, HiFi Stereo IEM Earphones, Dynamic Dual Driver Wired Earbuds with Detachable Cable, Noise Canceling Headset for Singers Musicians Drummers Audiophile (Blue, No Mic) | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
DCMEKA A09B-HG01
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong sound (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
DCMEKA A09B-HG010.213每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.030每美元得分
DCMEKA A09B-HG01 性价比高 7.1 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 39 specs.
