JBL Live Beam 3
JBL
84 综合评分
vs
Anker Space A40 A3936011
Anker
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
JBL Live Beam 3
78 满分 100 置信度中 24 条评价
JBL Live Beam 3 耳机因其出色的音质、深沉的低音以及创新的带触摸屏充电盒（无需手机即可控制）而获得大部分正面评价。用户欣赏可自定义的均衡器、有效的降噪和舒适的佩戴感，尽管有些人指出主动降噪并非最佳，充电盒的电池续航可以更好。然而，相当一部分用户报告了严重问题，例如固件更新导致一只耳机停止工作、糟糕的客户支持以及随机重新连接或设置重置等错误，这导致了对购买的强烈警告。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 深沉丰富的低音
- 创新的触摸屏充电盒
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 有效的降噪
缺点
- 固件更新失败导致耳机故障
- 客户支持不佳
- 充电盒电池续航不足
- 主动降噪并非最佳
- 随机重新连接和设置重置等错误
Sound quality 12
Charging case screen 8
Active noise cancellation 10
Firmware update issues 3
Battery life 7
Fit and comfort 8
Anker Space A40 A3936011
88 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Soundcore Space A40 耳机在音质、电池续航和降噪方面获得了压倒性的积极反馈。用户赞赏其可定制的应用程序、舒适的佩戴感和性价比，尽管有些人指出主动降噪不如竞争对手强大，并且在某些环境中连接偶尔会中断。总体而言，它们被强烈推荐为高端品牌的预算友好型替代品。
优点
- 出色的音质，可自定义均衡器
- 长续航，支持快速充电
- 有效的降噪
- 舒适稳固的佩戴
- 极高的性价比
缺点
- 主动降噪不如某些竞争对手强大
- 偶尔出现蓝牙连接断开
- 触控同时只能使用少数功能
- 耳塞可能对某些用户造成不适
- 电池续航略低于宣传
Sound quality 8
Battery life 7
Noise cancellation 7
Value for money 6
Comfort and fit 6
App and customization 5
评分
Budget
Travel
Fitness
Commute
Gaming
Music
Calls
规格
| JBL Live Beam 3 | Anker Space A40 A3936011 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.08 kg | 0.02 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | DLC Driver |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 11 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Max SPL | 96 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | JBL Live Beam 3 - True Wireless Noise-Cancelling Closed-Stick Earbuds, 48Hrs Total Playback, Wireless Charging, 6 Mics for Perfect Calls, Multi-Point Connection, IP55 Waterproof and dustproof | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.2 |
| Profiles | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | USB Type C |
| Range | 10.100000381469727 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs★ | 10 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs | 0.16699999570846558 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 10min=4hrs | 10 min for 4 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 36 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | 68 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | 2 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL Headphones | soundcore |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | IPX4 |
优缺点
JBL Live Beam 3
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
Anker Space A40 A3936011
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
价格
JBL Live Beam 30.073每美元得分
vs
Anker Space A40 A39360110.199每美元得分
Anker Space A40 A3936011 性价比高 2.7 倍
结论
胜出: JBL Live Beam 3
Scores 84 overall, wins 3 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 40 specs.
