CCA Castor Pro
CCA
43 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
CCA Castor Pro
82 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
KZ Castor Pro Bass Enhanced IEM 因其强劲且受控的低音和出色的清晰度而广受赞誉，尤其是在搭配 DAC 使用时。用户强调双10mm动圈单元、可调开关和卓越的性价比，但舒适度和原装耳塞套是常见的抱怨点。少数用户报告了耐用性问题或音质不如更便宜的替代品，但大多数人认为这是低音爱好者的绝佳预算选择。
优点
- 强劲且受控的低音
- 出色的清晰度和细节
- 卓越的性价比
- 可调低音/高音开关
- 双10mm动圈单元
缺点
- 原装耳塞套不舒适
- 整体舒适度一般
- 需要DAC才能发挥最佳性能
- 部分产品存在耐用性问题
- 在低端设备上音质下降
Bass quality 10
Sound clarity 8
Value for money 7
Comfort and fit 6
Build quality 5
Durability 2
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| CCA Castor Pro | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | KZ Castor Pro Tunable in Ear Monitor, HiFi Improved Bass in Ear Headphone, Dual-Dynamic Driver Gaming Earbuds, IEM Earphones with 2PIN-C Detachable Cable | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
CCA Castor Pro
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (67th percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
CCA Castor Pro0.215每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.030每美元得分
CCA Castor Pro 性价比高 7.2 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.
