Technics EAH-AZ100-S
Technics
98 综合评分
vs
BASN BmasterX 6
BASN
40 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100-S
85 满分 100 置信度中 17 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质、有效的降噪和令人印象深刻的通话清晰度而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户称赞 LDAC 支持、舒适贴合和可定制应用程序，尽管有些人报告了贴合问题和外壳磁铁较弱。总体而言，它们被认为是发烧友和专业人士的顶级选择。
优点
- LDAC 带来的卓越音质
- 有效的降噪
- AI 带来的令人印象深刻的通话清晰度
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 可定制的 EQ 和 ANC 设置
缺点
- 部分用户贴合问题
- 外壳磁铁较弱
- 难以找到兼容的泡沫耳塞
- 应用程序中没有电池充电限制设置
- 价格较高
Sound quality 14
Noise cancellation 8
Call quality 4
Comfort and fit 7
Build quality 4
Battery life 5
BASN BmasterX 6
78 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这些入耳式耳机在游戏方面提供了卓越的细节和定向音频，许多用户称赞其清晰的声音和实惠价格下的坚固做工。然而，120Hz以下的低音可能会浑浊失真，PZT驱动单元在较旧或未经精细处理的录音上可能导致刺耳的高音。舒适度总体良好，但有些人认为贴合度仅算一般。总体而言，它们非常适合现代精心制作的音乐和游戏，但可能会让寻求清晰低音或能容忍明亮高音的听众失望。
优点
- 出色的游戏定向音频
- 清晰细腻的音质
- 坚固的做工和保护盒
- 物超所值
- 大多数用户佩戴舒适
缺点
- 120Hz以下低音浑浊失真
- PZT驱动单元在旧录音上高音刺耳
- 部分用户仅感觉佩戴舒适度一般
- 需要音频软件才能获得最佳音质
- 不适合清晰低音再现
Sound quality 7
Bass performance 4
Build quality 4
Value for money 4
Comfort 3
Gaming performance 3
评分
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100-S | BASN BmasterX 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | Bud |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | mm |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.25 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | hybrid |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 8 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 6★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | BASN BmasterX 6 Drivers Hybrid in-Ear Monitors with Noise Isolation for Musicians, Stage & Studio, Professional HiFi IEMs, Detachable 4-core OFC Silver-Plated Cable & Shockproof Case (Blue-White) |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | 3.5mm |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | Water-Resistant |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100-S
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
BASN BmasterX 6
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average connectivity (34th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ100-S0.029每美元得分
vs
BASN BmasterX 60.058每美元得分
BASN BmasterX 6 性价比高 2.0 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100-S
Scores 98 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 39 specs.
