HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
HP
96 综合评分
vs
Dell OptiPlex 7040-SFF
Dell
29 综合评分
买家怎么说
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
95 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
搭载Ryzen 7 8700F和RTX 5070的HP OMEN 35L台式机获得了压倒性的正面反馈。用户称赞其强大的性能、安静的运行和出色的散热，使其成为游戏和生产力任务的理想选择。构建质量和设计也被强调为坚固和现代。问答中提到了关于附带外设和灯光定制的一些小问题，但总体情绪非常高。
优点
- 强大的性能
- 安静的运行
- 出色的散热
- 坚固的构建质量
- 快速的SSD存储
缺点
- 不包含键盘/鼠标
- 灯光定制不明确
Performance 5
Quiet operation 4
Cooling 3
Build quality 3
Storage speed 3
Upgradability 2
Dell OptiPlex 7040-SFF
暂无用户反馈
评分
Gaming
Business
Creator
Developer
Home Office
Workstation
Ai Llm
Compact
规格
| HP OMEN GT16-0364 | Dell OptiPlex 7040-SFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★ | i7-6700 |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8★ | 4 |
| Frequency | 4.1 GHz★ | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB★ | 8 MB |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ | — |
| GPU Benchmark Score | 无数据 | |
| Type | discrete | — |
| VRAM | 12 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 8 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5★ | — |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 256 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | SSD |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | mid-tower | sff |
| PSU | 850W★ | — |
| Weight | 14.50 kg | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2★ | — |
| USB Ports | 8★ | — |
| Thunderbolt | 0 | — |
| HDMI | 1 x HDMI | — |
| DisplayPort | 3 x DisplayPort | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6★ | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ | — |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | — |
| System | ||
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 10 Pro |
优缺点
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ram (89th percentile)89th %ile
Dell OptiPlex 7040-SFF
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Strong reliability (69th percentile)
- Below average port selection (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average ram (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average storage (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average gpu (14th percentile)14th %ile
结论
胜出: HP OMEN GT16-0364
Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 26 specs.