AMD FX 9370 8-core AM3+
AMD
38 综合评分
vs
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851
Intel
96 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD FX 9370 8-core AM3+
暂无用户反馈
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851
88 满分 100 置信度中 14 条评价
从旧款英特尔芯片（如8700K或8600K）升级的用户报告称，在游戏和生产力方面有巨大提升，其中一人平均帧数增加了20帧。该CPU运行凉爽，尤其在打折时被认为物超所值。有人提到对于拥有近期英特尔代的用户来说不值得升级，还有用户警告安装时要小心，以免弯曲针脚。
优点
- 从旧芯片升级性能提升巨大
- 运行凉爽
- 打折时物超所值
- 游戏和生产力表现出色
- 新BIOS更新后稳定
缺点
- 从近期英特尔升级不值得
- 安装时有弯曲针脚的风险
- 需要新主板、内存、散热器
Performance boost from old chips 4
Value for money 3
Thermal performance 2
Upgrade worthiness 3
Installation difficulty 1
Gaming performance 3
评分
Productivity
Budget
Ai Llm
Gaming
Efficiency
Server
规格
| AMD FX 9370 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | FX | Core Ultra 7 |
| Model | 9370 | 265KF |
| Codename | Vishera | Arrow Lake-S |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 32 | 3★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 8 | 20★ |
| P-cores | — | 8★ |
| E-cores | — | 12★ |
| Threads | 8 | 20★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 8 | 36★ |
| L3 Cache | 8 | 30★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1851 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24★ |
| TDP | 220 | 125★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 250★ |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | None |
| NPU TOPS | — | 13★ |
优缺点
AMD FX 9370 8-core AM3+
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average efficiency (34th percentile)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF 20-core Intel Socket 1851
- Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 18 of 29 specs.