Panasonic RP-TCM125-W
Panasonic
33 Загальна оцінка
vs
Sony WF-1000XM6
Sony
98 Загальна оцінка
Оцінки
Calls
Travel
Commute
Budget
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Характеристики
| Panasonic RP-TCM125-W | Sony WF-1000XM6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | in-ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | small, medium, large | Four Sizes |
| Weight | 0.04 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 9 mm★ | 8.399999618530273 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 10 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 24 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP, TMAP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | SONY WF1000XM6/B Headphones |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 min for 1 hour playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 24 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Built-in voice control |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | Sony | Sound Connect |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
Плюси та мінуси
Panasonic RP-TCM125-W
- Strong comfort (74th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Sony WF-1000XM6
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
Ціни
Panasonic RP-TCM125-W
No current pricing available
Sony WF-1000XM6
Вердикт
Переможець: Sony WF-1000XM6
Scores 98 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 39 specs.
