SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Общая оценка
vs
Crucial BX500 2TB SATA III 2.5"

Crucial BX500 2TB SATA III 2.5"

Crucial
58 Общая оценка

Оценки

Console
SanDisk
85
Crucial
24
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Crucial
51
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Crucial
46
Budget
SanDisk
57
Crucial
79
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Crucial
57
Portable
SanDisk
23
Crucial
16

Характеристики

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Crucial BX500
Drive
Capacity
8,000
2,000
Form FactorM.2 22802.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
540
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Нет данных
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Нет данных
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
720
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
1,500,000
Warranty (years)5★3
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption✓★✗

Плюсы и минусы

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Crucial BX500 2TB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong capacity (79th percentile)
  • Strong endurance (71st percentile)
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (25th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (33rd percentile)

Вердикт

★ Победитель: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Лучше в:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Crucial BX500 Лучше в:

Budget