TCL Q65 75Q651F 75"
TCL
47 Pontuação geral
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 84.5"
Samsung
93 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Budget
Smart Home
Streaming
Sports
Corporate
Gaming
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
Especificações
| TCL Q65 75Q651F 75" | Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 84.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 75" | 85" |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel Type | QLED | QD-Mini-LED★ |
| Backlight | Direct LED | Mini-LED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Color Gamut | — | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Motion Tech | MEMC Frame Insertion | Motion Xcelerator 144Hz |
| Processor | — | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| Dolby Vision | ✓★ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HLG | ✓ | ✓ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| VRR | VRR | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| ALLM | ✓ | ✓ |
| Game Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Fire TV | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa | Amazon Alexa, Bixby |
| Screen Mirroring | Apple AirPlay 2 | SmartThings |
| Works With | — | Google Home, SmartThings |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | — | 2.0 |
| Wattage | — | 20W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surround Sound | DTS Virtual:X | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 4★ |
| HDMI Version | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2★ |
| Ethernet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optical Audio | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 200x200 | 600x400 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 235W★ |
| Energy Star | — | ✓★ |
| Annual Energy | — | 439 kWh★ |
| Weight | 23.50 kg★ | 40.10 kg |
Prós e Contras
TCL Q65 75Q651F 75"
- Strong hdr (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
- Strong audio (66th percentile)
Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 84.5"
- Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong smart (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
Veredito
Vencedor: Samsung Neo QLED QN70F 84.5"
Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 12 of 38 specs.