MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI
16 Pontuação geral
vs
Intel Core i9 12900 16-core LGA1700

Intel Core i9 12900 16-core LGA1700

Intel
79 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Efficiency
MSI
11
Intel
90
Productivity
MSI
15
Intel
83
Budget
MSI
18
Intel
83
Ai Llm
MSI
14
Intel
77
Server
MSI
15
Intel
72
Gaming
MSI
14
Intel
70

Especificações

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFiIntel Core i9 12900
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 9Core i9
Model900012900
Codename—Alder Lake-S
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—10★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—16★
P-cores—8★
E-cores—8★
Threads—24★
Base ClockSem dados
2,400
Boost ClockSem dados
5,100
Cache
L2 Cache—14★
L3 Cache—30★
Performance
PassMark MultiSem dados
33,626
PassMark SingleSem dados
4,004
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5DDR5
Max Speed
8,400
4,800
Channels22
Max Memory
256
128
ECC—✓★
Platform & Power
SocketAM5LGA1700
PCIe5.05.0
PCIe Lanes—16★
TDP—65★
Max Turbo Power—202★
Unlocked—✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—Intel UHD Graphics 770

Prós e Contras

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average single thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Intel Core i9 12900 16-core LGA1700

  • Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong single thread (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong multi thread (88th percentile)88th %ile

Preços

Both products are similarly priced.

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.006pontos por dólar
vs
Intel Core i9 12900 16-core LGA17000.030pontos por dólar

Intel Core i9 12900 16-core LGA1700 oferece 5.0x melhor custo-benefício

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

Intel Core i9 12900 16-core LGA1700

Veredito

★ Vencedor: Intel Core i9 12900

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.

Intel Core i9 12900 Melhor em:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Considere também