Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Totaalscore
vs
Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM

Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM

Canon
63 Totaalscore

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
52
Macro
Nikon
88
Canon
61
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
70
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
48
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
34
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
58
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
69
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
70
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
61

Specificaties

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm200 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm800 mm
Elements1317
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/54
Min Aperturef/2.86.3-9
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★2.00 kg
Filter Thread67 mm95 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorNano USM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★800 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:4

Voor- & Nadelen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon RF 200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average build (13th percentile)13th %ile

Oordeel

★ Winnaar: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Beter in:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports