Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron
54 Totaalscore
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Totaalscore

Scores

Professional
Tamron
41
Nikon
89
Macro
Tamron
48
Nikon
88
Budget
Tamron
67
Nikon
85
Street
Tamron
47
Nikon
84
Portrait
Tamron
57
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Tamron
49
Nikon
82
Landscape
Tamron
35
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
36
Nikon
73
Travel
Tamron
47
Nikon
70

Specificaties

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture—f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.54 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Voor- & Nadelen

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Oordeel

★ Winnaar: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Beter in:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports