Kingston DC2000B 960GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston DC2000B 960GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
69 종합 점수
vs
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 종합 점수

점수

Console
Kingston
58
SanDisk
86
Workstation
Kingston
61
SanDisk
85
Gaming
Kingston
60
SanDisk
85
Budget
Kingston
67
SanDisk
72
Laptop
Kingston
59
SanDisk
66
Portable
Kingston
16
SanDisk
24

사양

Kingston DC2000BSanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Drive
Capacity
960
8,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation45★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)데이터 없음
14,900
Sequential Write (MB/s)데이터 없음
13,200
Random Read (IOPS)데이터 없음
2,200,000
Random Write (IOPS)데이터 없음
2,400,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—nCache 4.0
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
700
4,800
MTBF (hours)데이터 없음
1,750,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓✓

장단점

Kingston DC2000B 960GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong speed (67th percentile)

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

결론

★ 승자: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 더 나은 점:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation