Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 종합 점수
vs
Artra Lab Latalumen 12mm f/2 12mm

Artra Lab Latalumen 12mm f/2 12mm

Artra Lab
53 종합 점수

점수

Professional
Sigma
98
Artra Lab
41
Portrait
Sigma
90
Artra Lab
38
Street
Sigma
88
Artra Lab
48
Budget
Sigma
85
Artra Lab
44
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Artra Lab
34
Macro
Sigma
83
Artra Lab
67
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Artra Lab
32
Landscape
Sigma
77
Artra Lab
50
Travel
Sigma
75
Artra Lab
46

사양

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmArtra Lab Latalumen 12mm f/2 12mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm12 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm12 mm
Elements1612
Groups119
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements52
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatinglow-reflective multilayer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades910
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.28 kg
Filter Thread72 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm200 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

장단점

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Artra Lab Latalumen 12mm f/2 12mm

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (77th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

결론

승자: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm 더 나은 점:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports