Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm
Sigma
92 総合スコア
vs
Fujifilm GF GF45-100mmF4 R LM WR 45-100mm
Fujifilm
52 総合スコア
スコア
Travel
Street
Professional
Macro
Portrait
Budget
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
スペック
| Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm | Fujifilm GF GF45-100mmF4 R LM WR 45-100mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 10 mm | 45 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 16 |
| Groups | 10 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm G |
| Format | APS-C★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.26 kg★ | 1.00 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 117 mm★ | 650 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:4★ | 0.13x |
長所と短所
Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm
- Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
Fujifilm GF GF45-100mmF4 R LM WR 45-100mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average macro (27th percentile)
価格
Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm0.017ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Fujifilm GF GF45-100mmF4 R LM WR 45-100mm0.006ドルあたりのスコア
Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm 2.8倍のコストパフォーマンス
Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm
Fujifilm GF GF45-100mmF4 R LM WR 45-100mm
結論
勝者: Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm
Scores 92 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
