ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7 Black
ASUS
97 総合スコア
vs
XFX Radeon RX 6600 XT SPEEDSTER SWFT210 8GB GDDR6
XFX
48 総合スコア
ASUS GeForce RTXがおすすめ：
Pick the ASUS ProArt RTX 5080 if you're serious about 4K gaming, ray tracing, or AI workloads and have the budget for a high-end card that stays cool under load.
XFX Radeon RXがおすすめ：
Grab the XFX RX 6600 XT if you're building a budget 1080p rig and want excellent price-to-performance without spending more than $500 on a GPU.
主な違い
- VRAM and memory bandwidth: the 5080 packs 16GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 960 GB/s bandwidth, while the 6600 XT makes do with 8GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus at 256 GB/s. That's a 4x bandwidth gap.
- Raw compute: the 5080 pushes 56.28 FP32 TFLOPS versus 10.6 on the 6600 XT. PassMark G3D scores tell the same story: 35,666 vs 16,440.
- 4K gaming is basically off the table for the 6600 XT (score of 30 vs 99), and ray tracing is weak on the XFX card too (48 vs 99). The 5080 handles both without breaking a sweat.
- Price gap is massive. The XFX sits around $430 while the 5080 runs $1,000+, so you're paying more than double for roughly 3-5x the performance.
- Real-world thermals flip the script a bit: XFX owners report junction temps hitting 84-94°C and some coil whine, while 5080 users say it stays cool at 67-68°C even when overclocked to 3.3 GHz.
購入者の声
ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7 Black
78 100点中 信頼度: 低 9 件のレビュー
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5080は、特に4Kゲーミングでの生のパフォーマンスが広く賞賛されており、多くのユーザーが要求の厳しいタイトルを難なく処理できると述べています。オーバークロックの可能性は印象的で、あるユーザーは67〜68°Cの低温を維持しながら3.3 GHzのブーストを達成しました。ただし、高価格は繰り返し指摘される懸念事項であり、1台は初期不良で到着し、交換が必要でした。全体的に、予算がある人、特にRTX 3090以前の旧世代からのアップグレードに推奨されます。
長所
- 優れた4Kゲーム性能
- 印象的なオーバークロックの可能性
- 負荷時に低温動作（67〜68°C）
- 上位モデルと比較して優れたコストパフォーマンス
- 堅牢なビルド品質
短所
- 高価格
- 1台が初期不良で到着
- 大型サイズのため広いケースが必要
- 1080pゲームにはコスト効率が悪い
4k gaming performance 5
Overclocking potential 2
Thermal performance 2
Price value 4
Build quality 2
Reliability defects 1
XFX Radeon RX 6600 XT SPEEDSTER SWFT210 8GB GDDR6
まだレビューがありません
スコア
Gaming 1440p
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 4k
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Budget
Workstation
Ai Llm
スペック
| ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt | XFX Radeon RX 6600 XT SPEEDSTER SWFT210 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | Blackwell | RDNA 2 |
| Class | consumer | consumer |
| Process | 5★ | 7 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7★ | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | データなし | |
| Stream Processors | データなし | |
| Tensor Cores | データなし | |
| RT Cores | 84★ | 32 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 56.279998779296875★ | 21.209999084472656 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 56.279998779296875★ | 10.600000381469727 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 360 | 160★ |
| Recommended PSU | 850 | 750★ |
| Power Connectors | 1x 16-Pin PCI Connector | 1 x 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Triple Fan★ | Dual Fan |
| Fans | 3★ | 2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 x16 | PCI Express 4.0 |
| DisplayPort | 2 | 3★ |
| HDMI | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Max Displays | 4★ | — |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | 8K |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 304 | 241★ |
| Slot Width | 2.5 | 2★ |
| Form Factor | Full Height | — |
| Weight | 2.09 kg | 1.00 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upscaling | DLSS 4 | FSR |
| AV1 Encode | ✓★ | — |
| VR Ready | ✓ | ✓ |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | ✓★ | — |
長所と短所
ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7 Black
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong rt (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average affordability (16th percentile)16th %ile
XFX Radeon RX 6600 XT SPEEDSTER SWFT210 8GB GDDR6
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong feature (66th percentile)
- Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
- Below average vram (31st percentile)
- Below average compute (33rd percentile)
結論
勝者: ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt
Scores 97 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 20 of 40 specs.