Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Punteggio complessivo
vs
BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

BLAZAR LENS
46 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Professional
Nikon
95
BLAZAR LENS
39
Portrait
Nikon
89
BLAZAR LENS
53
Street
Nikon
86
BLAZAR LENS
54
Budget
Nikon
86
BLAZAR LENS
41
Macro
Nikon
85
BLAZAR LENS
41
Landscape
Nikon
83
BLAZAR LENS
25
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
BLAZAR LENS
44
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
BLAZAR LENS
37
Travel
Nikon
75
BLAZAR LENS
36

Specifiche

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm65 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm65 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-frameFull-Frame (36 x 24 mm Sensor)
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.29 kg
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm460 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pro e Contro

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm

  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdetto

Vincitore: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports