MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

MSI
16 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4 22-core LGA2011-3

Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4 22-core LGA2011-3

Intel
55 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Productivity
MSI
15
Intel
66
Server
MSI
15
Intel
62
Ai Llm
MSI
14
Intel
57
Budget
MSI
22
Intel
36
Efficiency
MSI
11
Intel
34
Gaming
MSI
14
Intel
29

Specifiche

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFiIntel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 9Xeon
Model9000E5-2696 V4
Codename—Broadwell
Classdesktopserver
Process—14★
Cores & Clocks
Cores—22★
Threads—44★
Base ClockDati non disponibili
2,200
Boost ClockDati non disponibili
3,600
Cache
L2 Cache—5.5★
L3 Cache—55★
Performance
PassMark MultiDati non disponibili
24,517
PassMark SingleDati non disponibili
2,113
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR4
Max Speed
8,400
Dati non disponibili
Channels2★—
Max Memory
256
Dati non disponibili
ECC—✓★
Platform & Power
SocketAM5LGA2011-3
PCIe5.03.0
TDP—150★

Pro e Contro

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

  • Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4 22-core LGA2011-3

  • Strong ai (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (79th percentile)
  • Strong efficiency (71st percentile)
  • Below average affordability (30th percentile)

Prezzi

Both products are similarly priced.

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.006punteggio per dollaro
vs
Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4 22-core LGA2011-30.020punteggio per dollaro

Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4 22-core LGA2011-3 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.3x migliore

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5

Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4 22-core LGA2011-3

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4

Scores 55 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.

Intel Xeon E5 E5-2696 V4 Migliore per:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Da considerare anche