AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-core Socket TR4
AMD
81 Punteggio complessivo
vs
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
MSI
16 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
Specifiche
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | Ryzen Threadripper PRO | Ryzen 9 |
| Model | 5975WX | 9000 |
| Codename | Zen 3 | — |
| Class | hedt | desktop |
| Process | 7★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 32★ | — |
| P-cores | 32★ | — |
| Threads | 64★ | — |
| Base Clock | Dati non disponibili | |
| Boost Clock | Dati non disponibili | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 16★ | — |
| L3 Cache | Dati non disponibili | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | Dati non disponibili | |
| PassMark Single | Dati non disponibili | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | Dati non disponibili | |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | Socket TR4 | AM5 |
| PCIe | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | Dati non disponibili | |
| TDP | 280★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | — |
Pro e Contro
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-core Socket TR4
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong single thread (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5
- Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Prezzi
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-core Socket TR40.003punteggio per dollaro
vs
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM50.006punteggio per dollaro
MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi AM5 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.0x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Scores 81 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 25 specs.
