Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"

Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"

Samsung
62 Score global
vs
Lexar 4TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar 4TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar
90 Score global

Scores

Laptop
Samsung
58
Lexar
92
Workstation
Samsung
61
Lexar
91
Gaming
Samsung
49
Lexar
91
Console
Samsung
25
Lexar
87
Budget
Samsung
76
Lexar
74
Portable
Samsung
17
Lexar
24

Spécifications

Samsung 870 EVOLexar 4TB SSD
Drive
Capacity
1,000
4,000
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 5.0
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—5★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
560
14,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
530
13,000
Random Read (IOPS)Pas de données
2,100,000
Random Write (IOPS)
88,000
1,700,000
Hardware
NANDTLCSLC★
DRAM Cache✓✓
ControllerSamsung MKX Controller—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
600
2,800
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,500,000
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✗✗
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Avantages & Inconvénients

Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong endurance (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average random (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average affordability (31st percentile)

Lexar 4TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile

Prix

Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5" is 6 442 R$ cheaper (4.4x less).

Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"0.033score par dollar
vs
Lexar 4TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 22800.011score par dollar

Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5" offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.0x meilleur

Samsung 870 EVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"

Lexar 4TB SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280

Verdict

★ Gagnant: Lexar 4TB SSD

Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

Samsung 870 EVO Meilleur pour:

Budget

Lexar 4TB SSD Meilleur pour:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

A considérer aussi