Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC 135mm
Samyang
35 Score global
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Tamron
97 Score global
Scores
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spécifications
| Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC 135mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 16 |
| Groups | 7 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | Ultra Multi-Coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.82 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 800 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.8★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC 135mm
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Prix
Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC 135mm0.008score par dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.021score par dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.6x meilleur
Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC 135mm
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Verdict
Gagnant: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
