Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 Score global
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Vivitar
37 Score global
Scores
Travel
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Portrait
Spécifications
| Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 55 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 13 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/18 | — |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | 55mm |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.14 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 498 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.7★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (69th percentile)
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
Prix
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
No current pricing available
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Verdict
Gagnant: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Scores 68 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.