JJC LH-XF27 39mm
JJC
40 Score global
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Tamron
97 Score global
Scores
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spécifications
| JJC LH-XF27 39mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 39 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 39 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/27 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | for Fujifilm XF 23mm F2.8 R WR, for Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 23 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.8★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
JJC LH-XF27 39mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Prix
JJC LH-XF27 39mm0.215score par dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.021score par dollar
JJC LH-XF27 39mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 10.2x meilleur
JJC LH-XF27 39mm
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Verdict
Gagnant: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
