AKG K371 K371-BT

AKG K371 K371-BT

AKG
57 Score global
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 Score global

Scores

Budget
AKG
66
Beyerdynamic
85
Commute
AKG
49
Beyerdynamic
84
Gaming
AKG
59
Beyerdynamic
82
Music
AKG
64
Beyerdynamic
82
Work
AKG
45
Beyerdynamic
79
Studio
AKG
72
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
AKG
38
Beyerdynamic
69

Spécifications

AKG K371 K371-BTBeyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.30 kg0.22 kg
Ear CushionSlow-Retention Foamreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size50 mm45 mm
Drivers11
Freq Min5 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz22 kHz
Impedance32 Ω48 Ω
Sensitivity114 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, SBCAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.05.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length1.2000000476837158 m
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life40 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
Chargingmicro-USBUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Avantages & Inconvénients

AKG K371 K371-BT

  • Strong sound (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong battery (79th percentile)
  • Strong connectivity (74th percentile)
  • Below average anc (33rd percentile)

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Verdict

Gagnant: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 41 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Meilleur pour:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute