Jabra 6599-823-309

Jabra 6599-823-309

Jabra
42 Score global
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 Score global

Scores

Budget
Jabra
46
Beyerdynamic
85
Commute
Jabra
35
Beyerdynamic
84
Music
Jabra
36
Beyerdynamic
82
Gaming
Jabra
47
Beyerdynamic
82
Work
Jabra
43
Beyerdynamic
79
Studio
Jabra
38
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
Jabra
41
Beyerdynamic
68

Spécifications

Jabra 6599-823-309Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.11 kg0.22 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size28 mm45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz22 kHz
Impedance48 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth4.05.4
ProfilesA2DP v1.2, Hands free profile v1.6AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorUSB-C3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life10 hrs40 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs1.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

Avantages & Inconvénients

Jabra 6599-823-309

  • Strong connectivity (77th percentile)
  • Strong anc (75th percentile)
  • Strong mic (71st percentile)
  • Strong comfort (71st percentile)
  • Below average battery (15th percentile)15th %ile

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

Verdict

Gagnant: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 Meilleur pour:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute