Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm

Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm

Sigma
48 Puntuación general
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Budget
Sigma
65
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
40
Nikon
94
Travel
Sigma
40
Nikon
92
Landscape
Sigma
37
Nikon
88
Professional
Sigma
38
Nikon
82
Video Cinema
Sigma
48
Nikon
82
Street
Sigma
46
Nikon
81
Portrait
Sigma
57
Nikon
78
Macro
Sigma
18
Nikon
73

Especificaciones

Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm200 mm
Elements—19
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—1★
Coating—ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
Mount—Nikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.62 kg0.57 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—stepping motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—500 mm★
Max Magnification—0.28x★

Pros y Contras

Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (77th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (75th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Precios

Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

No current pricing available

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

También considerar