Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC

Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC

Sigma
52 Puntuación general
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Macro
Sigma
62
Canon
91
Landscape
Sigma
64
Canon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
48
Canon
83
Professional
Sigma
51
Canon
82
Travel
Sigma
61
Canon
82
Budget
Sigma
55
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
55
Canon
79
Street
Sigma
50
Canon
68
Portrait
Sigma
38
Canon
53

Especificaciones

Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DCCanon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min18 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm70 mm
Elements1515
Groups1312
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements22
Coatingsuper multi-layer coatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountNikon FCanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.39 kg0.49 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm239 mm
Max Magnification1:4.41:4.2

Pros y Contras

Sigma AF DC 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong build (66th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Veredicto

Ganador: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports