Intel 670p Series 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
The 3000 MB/s sequential read speed, nearly double the previous generation, makes this QLC NAND drive a fast option for everyday multitasking and gaming. Its 185 TBW endurance and 5-year warranty provide solid reliability for a budget-priced 512GB M.2 2280 NVMe drive. Best for budget-conscious desktop and laptop users who need a dependable, quick upgrade for everyday applications without paying premium prices.
No current retailer price
Snapshot
The 30-Second Version
The Intel 670p is the budget QLC drive done right, with a DRAM cache that keeps it snappy when others choke. It's not a speed demon, but for the price, it's one of the best value NVMe drives you can buy.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- DRAM cache on a budget QLC drive is rare and makes a real difference 95th
- Excellent value, especially when it's on sale 79th
- 5-year warranty with 185 TBW endurance 79th
- Runs cool in normal use and installs easily 78th
Cons
- QLC NAND means sustained write speeds drop off a cliff once cache fills
- Heats up during heavy writes, and you may need a firmware update to fix thermal throttling
- 512GB capacity is on the small side these days
- Slower than high-end PCIe 3.0 and any PCIe 4.0 drive
What owners think
The Word on the Street
How owner sentiment changed over time
ExclusiveBased on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.
Based on 13 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.
The proof
Performance
The 3000 MB/s sequential read is solidly middle of the pack for PCIe 3.0 drives, and the 1600 MB/s write is about average too. But the random write IOPS of 315K is actually well above average, which surprised us. That's where the DRAM cache earns its keep. You'll notice it when you're installing updates, moving a bunch of small files, or doing anything that isn't just one giant file copy. The catch is sustained writes. Once that cache fills up, QLC NAND slows down hard. For most people, that's a non-issue. If you're regularly moving 100GB+ files around, you'll feel it, and you should be looking at TLC drives instead.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 512 |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 3000 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 1600 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 110000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 315000 |
Hardware
| NAND | QLC |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 185 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1600000 |
| Warranty (years) | 5 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
| Hardware Encryption | Yes |
vs Competition
Against the Samsung 990 PRO or Crucial T500, the 670p looks slow. Those are PCIe 4.0 drives with TLC NAND and much higher endurance. But they also cost a lot more. The 670p isn't trying to compete with those. Its real competition is other budget QLC drives like the Crucial P3 or WD Blue SN570. Against those, the 670p wins on the DRAM cache alone. The P3 is DRAM-less and falls apart under sustained writes. The SN570 is TLC but also DRAM-less. If you're on a tight budget and want a drive that stays responsive, the 670p is the pick. If you need raw speed and endurance, save up for a TLC drive with DRAM.
| Spec | Intel 670p Series | Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G | Samsung 9100 PRO | Western Digital Black SN850X | Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 | Crucial T500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 512GB | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 2TB |
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 3,000 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 7,400 MB/s |
| Nand Type | QLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC |
| Dram Cache | - | true | true | true | false | true |
| Endurance | 185 TBW | 4000 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2400 TBW | 1200 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | User Sentiment | Endurance | Social Proof | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel 670p Series | 56 | 78.9 | 33.4 | 34.7 | 79.2 | 77.7 | 95.3 | 51.1 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G Compare | 93.3 | 94.4 | 94 | 92.5 | 79.2 | 94 | 95.3 | 8.5 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 99.3 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 92.5 | 0 | 86 | 99.6 | 5.1 |
| Western Digital Black SN850X Compare | 89 | 95.7 | 89.5 | 92.5 | 94.8 | 88.2 | 95.3 | 10.4 |
| Micron T710 CT4000T710SSD5 Compare | 99.1 | 99.2 | 89.5 | 92.5 | 0 | 86 | 77.3 | 11.8 |
| Crucial T500 Compare | 94 | 96.9 | 99 | 78.4 | 79.2 | 83 | 95.3 | 19.6 |
Price
Value & Pricing
This is where the 670p shines. It's not the fastest drive, but it's one of the best values in the budget NVMe space. The DRAM cache alone puts it ahead of most QLC competitors at this price. If you can grab one on sale, it's a no-brainer for a boot drive or secondary game storage. At full price, it's still decent, but the value proposition gets shakier when faster TLC drives drop into the same range.
Read more
Overview
The Intel 670p is one of those drives that quietly does its job and doesn't ask for attention. It's a 512GB QLC NVMe drive with a DRAM cache, which is honestly the secret sauce here. Most budget QLC drives skip the DRAM to save a buck, and you feel it the second you push them hard. Intel didn't, and that's why this thing punches above its weight. The headline numbers are 3000 MB/s read and 1600 MB/s write, which won't set any records, but for everyday use, game loading, and general snappiness, it's plenty. The real story is value. At the prices these have been hitting, especially on sale, you're getting a dependable drive with a 5-year warranty and 185 TBW endurance. That's not spectacular endurance, but for a boot drive or game library, it's fine.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Intel 670p good for gaming?
Yeah, it's fine for gaming. Load times will be quick, and the DRAM cache helps with texture streaming and small file reads. Just don't expect it to match a PCIe 4.0 drive in raw throughput. For most games, you won't notice the difference.
Q: Will this work in my laptop?
If your laptop has an M.2 2280 slot with PCIe 3.0 x4 support, yes. It's a standard form factor and works in most modern laptops and desktops. Owners report good compatibility, including with older Macs. Just check your laptop's specs before buying.
Q: How long will this drive last?
Intel rates it for 185 TBW, which means you can write 185 terabytes to it before the warranty runs out. For a boot drive or game library, that's years of normal use. If you're writing hundreds of gigabytes a day, you'll want a TLC drive with higher endurance.
Who Should Skip This
If you're doing heavy video editing, constant large file transfers, or anything that hammers sustained writes, this isn't your drive. The QLC NAND slows down hard once the cache fills, and 185 TBW endurance won't hold up to that kind of abuse. Go grab a TLC drive like the Samsung 990 PRO or Crucial T500 instead. You'll pay more, but you'll get the endurance and sustained speed you need.
Verdict
The Intel 670p 512GB is a solid, dependable budget NVMe drive that outperforms its price point thanks to a DRAM cache most competitors skip. It's not the fastest, and the QLC NAND has real limitations under sustained writes, but for everyday use, gaming, and general storage, it's a great buy. If you see it on sale, grab it. If you're doing heavy video editing or constant large file transfers, spend more on a TLC drive.
Usage Scores
- Overall63.5
- Budget77.4
- Gaming46.5
- Laptop63.8
- Console23.2
- Portable14.6
- Workstation50.9