TCL P7K 43P7K 43"
TCL
38 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"
Samsung
91 Overall Score
Scores
Sports
Budget
Streaming
Smart Home
Gaming
Corporate
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
Specifications
| TCL P7K 43P7K 43" | Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 43" | 65" |
| Resolution | 4K | 8K★ |
| Panel Type | QLED | Mini-LED★ |
| Backlight | QLED | Mini-LED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Screen Finish | — | matte |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Color Gamut | — | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Motion Tech | 120Hz Game Accelerator | Motion Xcelerator 165Hz |
| Processor | AiPQ Processor | NQ8 Gen2 |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | Multi HDR Format | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| Dolby Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✗ | ✓★ |
| HLG | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| VRR | — | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| ALLM | — | ✓★ |
| Game Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Google TV | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa | Amazon Alexa, Bixby |
| Screen Mirroring | — | SmartThings |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | — | 4.2.2 |
| Wattage | — | 70W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓ | ✓ |
| Surround Sound | — | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 4★ |
| HDMI Version | — | 2.1★ |
| USB Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | ✓ | ✓ |
| Optical Audio | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 400x300 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 316W★ |
| Energy Star | — | ✗ |
| Annual Energy | — | 587 kWh★ |
| Weight | — | 25.60 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
TCL P7K 43P7K 43"
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
- Below average hdr (34th percentile)
Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong audio (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN900F 65"
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 17 of 38 specs.