Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

Team Group
38 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

38 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

This budget M.2 SATA SSD receives mixed reviews. While some users find it a cheap, simple upgrade for basic tasks, several report severe issues like random freezes, early failure signs within a month, and a lack of DRAM cache leading to increased wear. The drive is not recommended for heavy workloads, and some suggest spending more on a reputable brand like Samsung.

Pros
  • cheap price
  • simple upgrade for basic tasks
  • fast and stable for light use
  • compatible with older laptops
  • good for aesthetics (cable-free)
Cons
  • no DRAM cache
  • random freezes
  • early failure signs
  • mediocre endurance (60TBW)
  • not for heavy workloads
🤔 Performance 5
👎 Reliability 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👎 Dram cache 3
👍 Compatibility 3
🤔 Heat generation 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Team Group
46
Seagate
91
Budget
Team Group
53
Seagate
87
Gaming
Team Group
26
Seagate
86
Console
Team Group
13
Seagate
83
Workstation
Team Group
39
Seagate
83
Portable
Team Group
10
Seagate
24

Specifications

Team Group MS30Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
512
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
530
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
430
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
256
5,050
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✗

Pros & Cons

Team Group MS30 512GB SATA III M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (76th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average speed (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average capacity (34th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation