Kingston KC3000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston KC3000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
85 Overall Score
vs
Crucial E100 480GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial E100 480GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial
49 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Kingston
87
Crucial
82
Workstation
Kingston
85
Crucial
42
Gaming
Kingston
83
Crucial
39
Console
Kingston
81
Crucial
31
Laptop
Kingston
73
Crucial
52
Portable
Kingston
20
Crucial
12

Specifications

Kingston KC3000Crucial E100
Drive
Capacity
1,000
480
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation44
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
7,000
4,700
Sequential Write (MB/s)
6,000
2,500
Random Read (IOPS)
900,000
No data
Random Write (IOPS)
1,000,000
No data
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✓★✗
ControllerPhison E18—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
800
No data
MTBF (hours)
1,800,000
No data
Warranty (years)5★3
Features
Heatsink✓★—

Pros & Cons

Kingston KC3000 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong endurance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile

Crucial E100 480GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong affordability (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Strong speed (65th percentile)
  • Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average capacity (23rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Kingston KC3000

Scores 85 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 17 specs.

Kingston KC3000 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation