Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate FireCuda 530R

Seagate
67 Overall Score
vs
SanDisk SSD

SanDisk SSD

SanDisk
89 Overall Score

Scores

Laptop
Seagate
56
SanDisk
94
Workstation
Seagate
68
SanDisk
90
Gaming
Seagate
62
SanDisk
88
Budget
Seagate
50
SanDisk
86
Console
Seagate
56
SanDisk
83
Portable
Seagate
15
SanDisk
23

Specifications

Seagate FireCuda 530RSanDisk SSD
Drive
Capacity
1,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation45★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)No data
14,900
Sequential Write (MB/s)No data
11,000
Random Read (IOPS)No data
2,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
2,300,000
Hardware
NAND—TLC★
DRAM Cache✓✓
ControllerSeagate validated E18 controller—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
5,050
4,800
MTBF (hours)No data
1,750,000
Warranty (years)—1★
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption—✗

Pros & Cons

Seagate FireCuda 530R

  • Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong random (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong speed (67th percentile)

SanDisk SSD

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk SSD

Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

SanDisk SSD Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation